addiction recovery ebulletin judge removal pharma
September 14, 2019 – “Defendants do not bring this motion lightly,” the lawyers wrote in a filing Saturday morning on behalf of some of the nation’s biggest drug distributors and retailers but no drug manufacturers. “Taken as a whole and viewed objectively, the record clearly demonstrates that recusal is necessary.”
The lawyers contended Polster has overstepped his authority and created the appearance of bias. They cited his statements since the beginning of the case encouraging settlement so that money for badly needed drug treatment and other services could go quickly to communities hard hit by the opioid epidemic.
GIVING BACK IN STYLE – April 17, 2024 - “It’s still one day at…
RIDING THE WAVE...CALMLY – April 18, 2024 - “I was 13 years old and…
VIDEO – NEW YORK STORIES – April 23, 2024 - Sara Gettelfinger had steadily…
TRY IT, YOU’LL LIKE IT – April 18, 2024 - The rise in “sober…
AUDIO – SOBER MEN CAN DO THAT – April 4, 2024 - Acting icon…
I’LL BET HE GOES TO GA (not Georgia) – April 13, 2024 -The initial…