addiction recovery ebulletin judge removal pharma
September 14, 2019 – “Defendants do not bring this motion lightly,” the lawyers wrote in a filing Saturday morning on behalf of some of the nation’s biggest drug distributors and retailers but no drug manufacturers. “Taken as a whole and viewed objectively, the record clearly demonstrates that recusal is necessary.”
The lawyers contended Polster has overstepped his authority and created the appearance of bias. They cited his statements since the beginning of the case encouraging settlement so that money for badly needed drug treatment and other services could go quickly to communities hard hit by the opioid epidemic.
VIDEO – AT THE GATES OF SALVATION – Nov. 18, 2024 - “He checked into…
TIME WILL TELL – Nov. 11, 2024 - President-elect Donald Trump is expected to come…
POT IS SO OBSOLETE – Nov. 15, 2024 - Cannabis is a “genotoxic” substance because…
NPR AUDIO – STICK WITH THE WINNERS! – Nov. 14, 2024 - “I don’t shoot…
NEW BOOK! READING MATTERS – Nov. 15, 2024 - “This is a pointed and urgent…
DON’T MISS THESE – 2023 - 1. “Barfly” (1987) Directed by Barbet Schroeder and based…